Skip to content

Socials

Re NY (A Child)

30th October 2019

Court

Supreme Court

Practice Areas

Public Children Law

The UKSC has handed down judgment In the matter of NY (A Child) [2019] UKSC 49 , an important decision clarifying the High Court’s powers under the inherent jurisdiction to order the summary return of children.

Henry Setright QC, Mark Jarman and Michael Gration represented the respondent. They successfully argued that the inherent jurisdiction remained available to applicants seeking summary return both generally, and in circumstances where for technical reasons a 1980 Hague Convention application had been refused.

Teertha Gupta QC and Jacqueline Renton represented the intervener, Reunite and Christopher Hames QC, Michael Edwards and Charlotte Baker represented the intervener, The International Centre for Family Law, Policy and Practice (ICFLPP). The interveners supported the respondent on the point of principle engaged in the appeal.

What people say

Quote
Quote
Quote
The calibre of barristers is fantastic, and their supportive approach and availability to us as clients is invaluable.
Quote
Chambers and Partners, 2026
Quote
4PB is a standout chambers in the field of family law.
Quote
Legal 500, 2026
Quote
They will always be the stand-out set for clerking. They always go the extra mile and they seem to be able to fix any problem.
Quote
Chambers and Partners, 2026
Quote
Outstanding children set, with a really fantastic cross-section of knowledgeable and top-class barristers.
Quote
Legal 500, 2026