Skip to content

Socials

Henry Setright QC and Michael Gration appear for successful appellant in the Supreme Court.

19th March 2021

The Court of Appeal had held that whilst a child that had made their own asylum application could not be returned under the 1980 Hague Convention until such time as that application had been refused, a child that was named as a dependant on an asylum application made by their parent had no such protection.

The appellant challenged that conclusion on appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that a child who can be understood to be an applicant for asylum cannot be returned to the country from which they have sought protection, until such time as the asylum claim has been finally determined. If the asylum claim is granted, the protection from being returned would continue.

This issue is one that had arisen in 1980 Hague Convention proceedings fairly frequently prior to this decision, but the issue had not been authoritatively settled prior to this case. The UK Supreme Court has also given important guidance on how the Family Division of the High Court can work alongside the Home Office and, if necessary, the Tribunals in order to ensure that 1980 Hague Convention proceedings are not unduly delayed in circumstances where a parent and/or child has made an asylum claim.

To read the Supreme Court Judgment click here.

What people say

Quote
Quote
Quote
The clerking team is the best there is. Nothing is too much trouble and no problem is insurmountable. They just make life easier at every turn.
Quote
Chambers and Partners, 2025
Quote
4PB is a set with top-class counsel at all levels in matrimonial finance work.
Quote
Legal 500, 2024
Quote
An immensely respected set recognised for its immeasurable expertise in private and public children law, as well as its complementary skill in matrimonial finance work.
Quote
Chambers and Partners, 2025
Quote
4PB is ‘a brilliant set across the board – top choice for children law matters.'
Quote
Legal 500, 2025