News
DL v EL
16th July 2013
The Court of Appeal considered issues of habitual residence and wrongful removal. The Court of Appeal concluded that the tests for habitual residence under EU and English law are indistinguishable and that the return of a child in accordance with a court order was not rendered wrongful by a subsequent appeal which quashed the order relied on.
Henry Setright QC and Michael Gration represented the respondent; Teertha Gupta QC and Michael Edwards represented Reunite (Intervener) and David Williams QC represented the Centre for family law and practice (Intervener)
To read the full jugdement click here
What people say
The calibre of barristers is fantastic, and their supportive approach and availability to us as clients is invaluable.
4PB is a standout chambers in the field of family law.
They will always be the stand-out set for clerking. They always go the extra mile and they seem to be able to fix any problem.
Outstanding children set, with a really fantastic cross-section of knowledgeable and top-class barristers.