News
DL v EL
16th July 2013
The Court of Appeal considered issues of habitual residence and wrongful removal. The Court of Appeal concluded that the tests for habitual residence under EU and English law are indistinguishable and that the return of a child in accordance with a court order was not rendered wrongful by a subsequent appeal which quashed the order relied on.
Henry Setright QC and Michael Gration represented the respondent; Teertha Gupta QC and Michael Edwards represented Reunite (Intervener) and David Williams QC represented the Centre for family law and practice (Intervener)
To read the full jugdement click here
What people say
The clerking team is the best there is. Nothing is too much trouble and no problem is insurmountable. They just make life easier at every turn.
4PB is a set with top-class counsel at all levels in matrimonial finance work.
An immensely respected set recognised for its immeasurable expertise in private and public children law, as well as its complementary skill in matrimonial finance work.
4PB is ‘a brilliant set across the board – top choice for children law matters.'