News
Reported Case: Four members of 4PB appear in KRM v VWT [2025] EWHC 3082 (Fam)
22nd December 2025
Four members of 4PB appeared in KRM v VWT [2025] EWHC 3082 (Fam), a High Court decision concerning a father’s application for the summary return of three children (aged 6, 3 and 2) to Australia pursuant to the 1980 Hague Convention, following their wrongful retention in England. The mother opposed the return on the basis of grave risk of harm under Article 13(b). The father also sought an order under the inherent jurisdiction, requiring the youngest child (6 months old, and born in England after the retention of her siblings) to be summarily returned to Australia so that the Australian courts could conduct a full welfare assessment of her best interests alongside those of the elder children.
Christopher Hames KC, leading Harry Langford (instructed by Philcox Gray Solicitors), appeared for the Applicant Father.
Ruth Kirby KC, leading Clarissa Wigoder (instructed by McAlister Family Law), appeared for the Respondent Mother.
The case raised two interesting points of law: first, whether the inherent jurisdiction can be used to order the summary “return” of a child born and habitually resident in England to a country they have never been to; and secondly, whether the court retains jurisdiction to make orders for contact pending execution of a return order made pursuant to the 1980 Hague Convention.
Read the judgment here.
Christopher Hames KC
Ruth Kirby KC
Harry Langford
Clarissa Wigoder
What people say
The calibre of barristers is fantastic, and their supportive approach and availability to us as clients is invaluable.
4PB is a standout chambers in the field of family law.
They will always be the stand-out set for clerking. They always go the extra mile and they seem to be able to fix any problem.
Outstanding children set, with a really fantastic cross-section of knowledgeable and top-class barristers.